Is India really inexperienced? The numbers point to South Africa instead

Rohit Sharma likely to return as ODI captain in Shubman Gill's absence
Sandpaper Gate returns? Monty Panesar attacks Steve Smith before The Ashes!
Is the Indian cricket team really not a true unit?
Burnout Alert: Team India’s grind is breaking Shubman Gill
Shubman Gill leaves on a stretcher, but fans still troll him? Pathetic
Real reason behind Jadeja taking a ₹4 cr pay cut to join Rajasthan
The reason behind Josh Inglis’ exit from PBKS
Andre Russell released by KKR: The break-up no one saw coming
Explained: Why CSK released Matheesha Pathirana
Sports | Cricket
Aryan Kumar Chopra
19 NOV 2025 | 05:05:07

Gautam Gambhir recently highlighted the “inexperience” in India’s batting lineup - but the surprising part is that the real inexperience lies on the other side. And almost no one is talking about it. When you compare international caps, high-pressure games, World Cup exposure, and total match experience, South Africa’s batting unit is noticeably younger and far less tested than India’s.

India’s core has:

More ICC tournament exposureMore high-stakes knockoutsMore years in international cricketMore games in top-tier T20 leagues

Yet the narrative repeatedly lands on India being “inexperienced,” simply because expectations are higher and scrutiny is louder. Meanwhile, South Africa’s middle order - still developing, still raw, still building identity - escapes that spotlight despite having significantly fewer big-match reps.

So the real question is: Is India truly inexperienced, or are we just choosing a convenient narrative while ignoring the actual numbers?

Logo
Download App
Play Store BadgeApp Store Badge
About UsContact UsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyCopyright © Editorji Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 2025. All Rights Reserved