Underbowled. Undervalued. Unbelievable! Why was Washington Sundar ignored?

Samson paying the price for being 'flexible' than Gill? Surya explains
Why Virat Kohli's consistency can never be matched!
Hardik’s Kohli-inspired solo session sets tone for his T20I return
How Root saved Hayden from a nude run at MCG
Rohit Sharma in SMAT knockouts - what’s behind this sudden move?
First time in 7 years - Instances when India lost despite Virat's hundred
Is Jaiswal really a one-format player? The left-arm problem explained
Shubman Gill injury update - Rehab timeline and possible return date
Virat Kohli and 2027 World Cup debate: Why is this even a question?
Sports | Cricket
Sidhant Maheshwari
26 JUL 2025 | 05:32:44

For the first time in a decade, India conceded over 500 runs in an away Test innings. The venue? Old Trafford. The match? A do-or-die clash where India desperately needed to claw back into the series. But while Joe Root scripted a masterclass and England took a commanding first-innings lead, the most baffling talking point wasn’t the runs conceded, it was the bizarre underuse of Washington Sundar.

Let’s rewind.At Lord’s, Sundar was India’s best bowler in the second innings. His figures of 4/22 were not only the best by an Indian spinner at Lord’s this century. So naturally, one would expect him to be a frontline option in the next Test. Except... he wasn’t.

Inexplicably, Sundar wasn’t handed the ball until the 69th over of the innings. By then, England were 305/2, cruising, and well on their way to a mountain of runs. And then, when Sundar did bowl, he made an instant impact. He dismissed Ollie Pope and Harry Brook in quick succession, offering India a glimmer of hope.

So the question is, why the delay? Sundar was extracting drift, turning the ball, and maintaining control. His economy rate of just 3 was the best among all Indian bowlers on the day. In comparison, India’s pacers, especially with the second new ball, were struggling to make inroads. Yet the team management persisted with them, ignoring the obvious rhythm Sundar was in.

By the end of play, India had bowled 135 overs. Of those, Sundar got just 19. That's not just underutilization, it's tactical negligence. A bowler who had just delivered a match-winning spell days earlier was barely called upon, even when the rest of the attack was visibly ineffective.Was it captain Shubman Gill’s decision-making? Or was it simply a misread of the conditions?

Whatever the reason, it left fans and pundits scratching their heads. Sundar wasn’t just underbowled, he was ignored at the cost of momentum. And now, with England firmly in control of the Test and the series slipping from India’s grasp, it’s hard not to wonder: Did India’s hesitation to back their best bowler cost them big?

Also Watch: Xavi as coach of Indian football team? The dream that died before kickoff!

Logo
Download App
Play Store BadgeApp Store Badge
About UsContact UsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyCopyright © Editorji Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 2025. All Rights Reserved