Just before the second Test against England at Edgbaston, Team India made a stunning decision: Jasprit Bumrah, arguably the best fast bowler in the world right now, was rested. Not because of an injury. Not due to any immediate concern. But as part of what the team called “workload management.” And that too, after a seven-day break since the first Test. It left fans puzzled—and former cricketers even more so.
The decision comes at a curious time. India are 1-0 down in a five-match series, and Edgbaston, known for its seam-friendly conditions, seemed tailor-made for a bowler of Bumrah’s calibre. Instead, the management opted to “manage” his workload with the bigger picture in mind—ensuring he's available for three of the five Tests, with Lord’s being the next stop.
But in a game where momentum can shift series and series can define careers, this move hasn’t gone down well.
Former head coach Ravi Shastri expressed disbelief over the call, stating that decisions in such crucial matches shouldn't be left to the player but taken by the captain and coaching staff. “You play your best team when the stakes are high,” he implied. Irfan Pathan echoed similar sentiments, questioning how a team could rest a fully fit Bumrah after just one game, especially when he was India’s top performer in Hyderabad.
The most stinging analogy came from Dale Steyn, who compared the decision to Portugal benching Ronaldo in a World Cup knockout—a strategic call that borders on absurd.
Bumrah is not just any bowler—he is India's go-to weapon in high-pressure situations, a rare mix of control, pace, and intelligence. His absence is not just about missing a few overs—it’s about missing the tone he sets for the entire bowling attack. Replacing him with a promising, yet inexperienced Akash Deep adds pressure to a team that already finds itself chasing the series.
In modern cricket, workload management is important. But timing is everything. And this one feels off. If India fail to square the series, this decision will be dissected as one of over-caution, and perhaps, overconfidence.
Strategic rest or avoidable gamble? Only the result will answer. But for now, the cricket world is watching—and wondering.
Also Watch: Bowling took the hit, batting got the boost: Smart move or selection chaos?
