Same chip, wildly different results! Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10

Three phones, one showdown. The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, Poco F7, and iQOO Neo 10 all share the same Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chip, but each brings its own flavour: Oppo adds a built-in fan for extra cooling, Poco offers the biggest battery, and iQOO promises consistently smooth performance.

With prices starting under ₹35,000 for Poco and iQOO, and ₹37,999 for Oppo, it’s time to see if spending more really means better results.

We’re putting them through Antutu, Geekbench, 3DMark, CPU throttling, and BGMI, all on the latest software.

Let’s see which one actually comes out on top.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: Antutu

Let’s kick things off with Antutu, and yes, we ran it twice for fairness.

In round one, the iQOO Neo 10 took the lead with a monster 2,063,287 score, while the Oppo K13 Turbo followed at 1,988,925, and the Poco F7 lagged behind at 1,831,533.

Neo 10’s CPU and GPU scores were solid, but Oppo actually edged ahead on CPU while falling a bit short on GPU. Poco trailed in both.

But round two shook things up: Neo 10 dropped sharply to 1,719,714, Oppo dipped too, but Poco stayed almost flat at 1,830,000.

So, while Neo and Oppo chase high peaks, Poco’s performance is more stable run after run.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: Geekbench

Time for Geekbench, where we’re looking at both single-core and multi-core results, and yes, we ran it twice for accuracy.

The iQOO Neo 10 absolutely crushed both rounds, pulling in 2138 single-core and 7154 multi-core in round one, followed by a nearly identical 2144 and 7113 in round two.

The Poco F7 stayed comfortably in second, notching 1964/6058 and then 1946/6022, showing just a slight dip but overall good consistency.

But the real shocker was the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, which managed only 793 and 4525 in round one, then barely improved to 888 and 4499 in round two.

This is way off the mark for the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and probably down to poor optimisation—Oppo really needs a software update to fix this odd result.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: 3DMark Extreme Wildlife Extreme Stress Test

Now for the 3DMark Extreme Wildlife test, which really puts the GPU to work. This round got interesting: the iQOO Neo 10 showed the best stability at 85.6%, just ahead of the Poco F7 at 83%.

But surprisingly, the actual loop scores across the board weren’t that impressive. Even more bizarre, the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, despite having just 52.6% stability, pulled off better best and lowest loop scores than the others.

At this stage, it looked like the Poco F7 had it in the bag—until suddenly, right as I was grabbing a screenshot, high-temp mode triggered on the F7, something

I’ve never seen in previous tests. So, we paused, gave all three phones a proper 15–20 minute break before moving on.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: CPU Throttling Test

On to the CPU throttling test, which is all about sustained performance. Here, things were surprisingly close: the iQOO Neo 10 throttled down to 81%, Poco F7 to 79%, and the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro—fan and all—slipped to just 76%.

But it’s the numbers that matter: the Poco F7 actually delivered higher max and average scores than the Neo 10, and its minimums nearly matched Neo’s average.

As for the K13 Turbo Pro, despite its cooling fan, it throttled the most and posted the weakest performance across the board.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: Post Benchmarks Battery Check

All three phones kicked off at a perfect 100%. By the end of the benchmark runs, the iQOO Neo 10 settled at 72%, the Poco F7 dropped further to 67%, while the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro finished in between at 70%. Each one lost a chunk of peak performance.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: Gaming Test (BGMI)

Time to test BGMI. We ran a 15-minute gaming session on each phone, all using the latest game version available during testing.

First up, the iQOO Neo 10. While it technically supports 144Hz, it only works with bypass charging and recent software bugs meant we stuck with 120Hz. The Neo 10 averaged 117.1 fps, with 5% lows at 76.5 fps, and hit a max temperature of 35.4°C—very solid for a long match.

The Poco F7, which maxes out at 90Hz, managed an average of 89.6 fps and 5% lows of 86.1, while keeping things cool at just 31°C.

The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro averaged 116.2 fps at 120Hz, but its 5% lows dropped sharply to 66.2 fps, a sign that it could struggle in longer play sessions. However, its temperatures remained reasonable, peaking at 32.4°C.

Each phone delivered a different gaming experience, showing just how much tuning matters even with the same processor.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: Post Gaming Battery Check

After our gaming session, it was time for another battery check. The iQOO Neo 10 was left with 65%, the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro with 63%, and the Poco F7, despite its bigger battery, dropped to 60%.

All three saw roughly a 7% dip, but the F7 lost the most.

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7 vs iQOO Neo 10: Verdict

So, what’s the real takeaway here?

Even though all three phones use the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, their performance is far from identical. Specs alone can’t capture how much tuning, thermal management, and software optimisation matter.

The iQOO Neo 10 stands out as the powerhouse, scoring big on both benchmarks and gaming.

The Poco F7 might not be flashy, but its consistent, stable performance and solid efficiency make it a smart pick for most users.

Oppo’s K13 Turbo Pro has potential with its built-in fan, but conservative tuning is clearly holding it back for now.

In the end, it’s a reminder that real-world testing exposes the gaps that spec sheets just can’t show.