Mohammed Shami’s continued absence from the Indian squad is becoming one of the most puzzling selection stories in recent times. Despite producing consistent and impactful performances in the domestic circuit, the experienced fast bowler was once again left out of the squad for the three-match ODI series against New Zealand. On form alone, it is difficult to argue against his case.
What added to the confusion was the messaging ahead of the announcement. Only days earlier, a BCCI source had indicated that Shami’s performances in domestic cricket were being “closely monitored” and that his return to the national setup was very much under consideration. That statement naturally created an expectation that the selectors were ready to re-engage with Shami’s case. The final squad, however, suggested otherwise.
The roots of this decision can be traced back to comments made earlier by chief selector Ajit Agarkar. He had pointed out that Shami had not played enough competitive cricket over the last few years and needed a sustained run of matches to be firmly back in contention. At the time, the logic seemed straightforward. Since then, Shami has responded exactly as expected—by staying on the field and delivering with the ball.
In the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy 2025, Shami finished as Bengal’s leading wicket-taker, claiming 16 wickets in seven matches while maintaining an economy rate under nine. His control, pace, and ability to strike at crucial moments stood out. That form has carried into the Vijay Hazare Trophy, where he has taken 11 wickets in five matches at an economy of 5.6, showing that his effectiveness is not limited to one format.
Despite these performances, selection has remained elusive. Bengal head coach Laxmi Ratan Shukla openly expressed his disappointment, describing Shami’s omission as unfair and praising his commitment to domestic cricket. Shukla also highlighted that few established international players make the same effort to consistently feature in domestic tournaments once they are out of the national setup.
At 36, Shami is aware that time is not an ally. While India’s selectors are clearly thinking long-term and planning for the future, Shami’s case presents a difficult question. How much weight does current performance truly carry when balanced against age, workload management, and forward planning?
For now, Shami continues to let his bowling do the talking. Whether that voice is eventually heard at the selection table remains to be seen.
Also Watch: Why 2026 will be a challenging year for Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma
