The big Bollywood lie: Why ‘steamy’ scenes aren’t steamy at all

'120 Bahadur': Do historical films have to be factually accurate?
Will Anushka Sharma's 'Chakda Xpress' finally drop on Netflix soon?
Is Huma Qureshi's concern about Bollywood losing touch with Hindi, valid?
Did Aditya Dhar’s comment on work hours target Deepika Padukone?
Control ChatGPT before it controls you
Is Bollywood’s entourage culture excess or simply reality of modern fame?
'Bigg Boss 19': Gaurav Khanna, Akanksha end relationship-trouble rumours
The future of cinema: Shakun Batra on AI-produced ₹200-crore films
Can Hollywood move beyond stereotypes in portraying Indian actors?
Entertainment | Bollywood
Naima Sood
21 NOV 2025 | 11:57:44

Bollywood has excelled in the art of making romance look like an effortless act. Rain sequences, dimmed lights, soft-focus frames-everything is done with the purpose of making audiences believe in on-screen chemistry. But step behind the camera and the illusion melts instantly.

Actors who shoot "steamy" scenes describe the experience as deeply technical and rehearsed, with moments that are often just outright awkward. And with intimacy coordinators like Naina Bhan now part of the process, the myth of spontaneous passion has been dismantled completely. Every movement is blocked, every gesture is approved, and every moment of contact is negotiated beforehand.

There's no mystery or magic-it's more like choreographing a dance than falling in love.

Where Emraan Hashmi Gets It Wrong

Emraan Hashmi, playing the role of an intimacy coordinator in "The Bads of Bollywood", recently said humor is what the job demands to ease tension. But experts believe this mindset blurs lines instead of protecting them.

Humor isn't a tool of safety-it's a shortcut that minimizes discomfort or silences actors who already feel vulnerable. Actual intimacy coordination depends on clear communication, defined boundaries, and constant consent checks. It's intentional. It's serious. And it's never about "lightening the mood."

The danger with Hashmi's interpretation is simple: it suggests intimacy coordination is just another extension of performance, when in reality, it's a safeguard preventing actors-especially women and newcomers-from being pressured, overexposed, or misunderstood on set.

Actors vs. Audience: Two Different Realities

Audiences always assume powerful chemistry must indicate real-life attraction. But, in reality, it's far less dreamy: actors performing intimate scenes are surrounded by crew members, lenses inches from their faces, and constant instructions about jawlines, breathing patterns, and camera angles.

It looks sensual to us only because editing, music, and lighting have transformed it: for the actors involved, it's a tiresome technical exercise, not an erotic fantasy. They don't think about sparks; they're thinking about continuity, choreography, and staying within agreed limits.

The difference between what the audience sees and what actually happens is huge. We're seeing something which is a very beautifully packaged illusion.

Why Boundaries Matter Now More Than Ever

Bollywood long depended on spontaneity and "adjusting" on the spot; a culture in which actors rarely felt safe, heard or anything less than pressured. Now intimacy coordinators exist precisely to prevent that.

With mapped touch, closed-set rules, consent-based choreography, and emotional check-ins, actors finally have the space to keep their private lives private while performing scenes that look intimate but feel strictly professional.

Viewers may appreciate the intensity onscreen, but the professionals working behind it thrive on structure, not seduction.

Logo
Download App
Play Store BadgeApp Store Badge
About UsContact UsTerms of UsePrivacy PolicyCopyright © Editorji Technologies Pvt. Ltd. 2025. All Rights Reserved